<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>judgesonmerit.org &#187; Tenesseean</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.judgesonmerit.org/tag/tenesseean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.judgesonmerit.org</link>
	<description>Making the move to merit selection for all appellate judges in Pennsylvania</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:27:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tennessee Sticking with Merit Selection</title>
		<link>http://www.judgesonmerit.org/2009/06/01/tennessee-sticking-with-merit-selection/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.judgesonmerit.org/2009/06/01/tennessee-sticking-with-merit-selection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shira Goodman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merit Selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merit Selection News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buck Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chattanoogan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[other states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tenesseean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tennessee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgesonmerit.org/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the last year, we&#8217;ve periodically reported about the legislative wrangling over whether or not to renew Tennesee&#8217;s Merit Selection system.  Well, it seems that Tennessee is sticking with Merit Selection and as the headline reads in the Tennessean &#8220;rejecting the election of judges.&#8221; As the Tennessean reports, the House and Senate have each passed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the last year, we&#8217;ve periodically reported about the legislative wrangling over whether or not to renew Tennesee&#8217;s Merit Selection system.  Well, it seems that Tennessee is sticking with Merit Selection and as the headline reads in the <em>Tennessean</em> &#8220;rejecting the election of judges.&#8221;</p>
<p>As the <em>Tennessean</em> <a href="http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009905290367" target="_blank">reports</a>, the House and Senate have each passed bills to maintain the current system, which uses a nominating commission and retention elections.  There will be some changes to the process, including a reduction in the number of lawyers on the nominating commission.</p>
<p>The <em>Chattanoogan</em>&#8216;s <a href="http://judgesonmerit.org/wp-admin/Tennessee Bar Association President Buck Lewis said, &quot;We are pleased that it now appears that Tennessee will continue to have a system of merit selection and retention elections for appellate judges." target="_blank">report</a> offers a run down of the votes and also quotes Tennesse Bar President Buck Lewis: &#8220;&#8216;We are pleased that it now appears that Tennessee will continue to have a system of merit selection and retention elections for appellate judges.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Smart move, Tennessee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.judgesonmerit.org/2009/06/01/tennessee-sticking-with-merit-selection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

