Comments on: Lady Justice is nonpartisan, but the PA court elections are not

By: Correction: Earlier PA post | American Courthouse

Correction: Earlier PA post | American Courthouse — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:45:19 +0000

[...] piece by Pennsylvania Supreme Court Justice Debra Todd. In it, I mistakenly characterized a related blog post by JudgesOnMerit as an “opposing view.” David Caroline from JudgesOnMerit corrected [...]

By: Gavel Grab » In Pa., Keeping ‘Lady Justice’ Free of Party Labels

Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:35:28 +0000

[...] Now David Caroline of judgesonmerit.org, sponsored by Pennsylvanians for Modern Courts, has responded. He dissects her commentary, draws key distinctions and underscores the pervasive influence of partisan judicial elections. His persuasive essay is entitled, “Lady Justice is nonpartisan, but the PA court elections are not.” [...]

By: Gavel Grab » Hunting ‘Lady Justice’ in Pennsylvania

Gavel Grab » Hunting ‘Lady Justice’ in Pennsylvania — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:03:56 +0000

[...] Now David Caroline of judgesonmerit.org has responded with a dissection of her commentary, drawing key distinctions and underscoring the pervasive influence of partisan judicial elections. His persuasive essay is entitled, “Lady Justice is nonpartisan, but the PA court elections are not.” [...]

By: Gavel Grab » Wednesday Media Summary

Gavel Grab » Wednesday Media Summary — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:21:53 +0000

[...] Judges On Merit: Lady Justice is nonpartisan, but the PA court elections are not [...]

By: PA Supreme Court Justice: Judicial Elections Don’t Affect Court | American Courthouse

Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:20:50 +0000

[...] Thanks to JudgesonMerit for brining this to our attention. You can find their spirited, opposing view here. [...]