Jan 21 2009

Washington State Voters Think Merit Selection Sounds Good

Washington State University is reporting that its recent survey on judicial selection (conducted with the American Judicature Society) reveals that voters are dissatisified with the current electoral system and favor implementing a Merit Selection system.  The two elements that were most appealing about Merit Selection were the use of a nominating commission and the inclusion of regular retention elections.

Survey respondents valued the idea of a nonpartisan nominating commission composed of lawyers and nonlawyers.  They believed the commission would focus judicial selection on qualifications and also would limit the Governor’s discretion in making judicial appointments.

Central to the survey’s findings was the respondents’ beliefs that a Merit Selection system with regular retention elections would actually provide more opportunity for voter input in judicial selection.  Voters felt that having every judge stand for retention at regular intervals would increase accountability and give voters an important chance to weigh in on a judge’s performance.

The researchers observe that:

It is clear that in a head-to-head choice, after having considered in some detail the major characteristics of both the current nonpartisan election system and the hypothetical commission-based system, the registered voters surveyed in Washington during the 2008 election season clearly prefer the commission system.

We hope voters in Washington will have an opportunity to decide whether to implement a new way to choose their judges.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

3 responses so far

3 Responses to “Washington State Voters Think Merit Selection Sounds Good”

  1. Gavel Grab » links for 2009-01-22on 22 Jan 2009 at 7:00 am

    [...] judgesonmerit.org » Washington State Voters Think Merit Selection Sounds Good [...]

  2. [...] further comment on the AJS/Washington State survey, see this posting in “Choose Judges on Merit,” the blog published by Pennsylvanians for Modern Courts.  Email This [...]

  3. [...] editorial compares a recent poll of voters in Washington with last year’s poll of Wisconsin voters.  The editorial argues that the Wisconsin poll, [...]

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply