May 06 2008
West Virginia Judicial Elections: Lawyers, Show Me the Money
The West Virginia Supreme Court elections continue to make the news. Earlier we wrote about justices forced to recuse (or not) from cases involving some big campaign donors. Now, at least one justice is talking about the realities of campaign fundraising in the Mountain State. Supreme Court Chief Justice Elliot Maynard has criticized the fact that a lot of attention is paid to business donations to judicial campaigns, while contributions from lawyers and law firms go largely unreported. Justice Maynard called these different levels of scrutiny “the worst hypocrisy.”
But even such concern can’t compete with the realities of judicial elections. According to the Charleston Gazette, a new study of campaign contributions shows that Justice Maynard has raised $586,873. Of that total, $134,050 was contributed by lawyers and their relatives. Maynard is not alone — one-third of the money contributed to the five candidates running in the primaries next week has come from lawyers.
As we’ve said all along, this kind of big-money politics can create the perception that “justice is for sale.” Litigants, facing opponents who may have donated thousands of dollars to the campaign of a judge or justice, might reasonably worry about whether they will be treated fairly. Even if the ruling is completely fair and in accordance with the law, the question may linger. Did money play a part in the decision?
Pennsylvania is facing a similar crisis of faith in the judiciary. As contributions to judicial campaigns increase, it gets harder for Pennsylvania citizens to trust that justice is being fairly administered. Whether it is or not is immaterial. The perception itself can potentially taint every case that goes before our courts.
The only way to combat the perception that “justice for sale” is to get money out of the judicial selection process. Merit Selection makes strong qualifications, not fundraising prowess, the most important credential for a judicial candidate. It’s time we got judges out of the fundraising business.
Tags: campaign contributions, elections, Judges, money, other states, Pennsylvania, West Virginia
Entries RSS
[...] emonlinemedia wrote an engrossing place today onHere’s a hurried excerptSupreme Court Chief Justice Elliot Maynard has criticized the fact that a assemblage of tending is stipendiary to activity donations to righteousness campaigns, connector contributions from lawyers and accruement firms go mostly unreported. … [...]
[...] Rebecca wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptThe West Virginia Supreme Court elections continue to make the news. Earlier we wrote about justices forced to recuse (or not) from cases involving some big campaign donors. Now, at least one justice is talking about the realities of … [...]
[...] Virginia Judicial Elections: Lawyers, Show Me the Money FOXNews.com wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptThe West Virginia Supreme Court [...]