<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We&#8217;re Only Talking about 31 Judges Out of 1,048 in Pennsylvania</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.judgesonmerit.org/2008/04/03/were-only-talking-about-31-judges-out-of-1048-in-pennsylvania/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.judgesonmerit.org/2008/04/03/were-only-talking-about-31-judges-out-of-1048-in-pennsylvania/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Making the move to merit selection for all appellate judges in Pennsylvania</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavel Grab &#187; 4/4/08: Around the Blogoshpere</title>
		<link>http://www.judgesonmerit.org/2008/04/03/were-only-talking-about-31-judges-out-of-1048-in-pennsylvania/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavel Grab &#187; 4/4/08: Around the Blogoshpere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://judgesonmerit.org/2008/04/03/were-only-talking-about-31-judges-out-of-1048-in-pennsylvania/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] We’re Only Talking about 31 Judges Out of 1,048 in Pennsylvania - Judges on Merit This post attempts to set the record straight on what the PMC is asking for in regards to merit selection. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We’re Only Talking about 31 Judges Out of 1,048 in Pennsylvania &#8211; Judges on Merit This post attempts to set the record straight on what the PMC is asking for in regards to merit selection. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

